The most common mistake is oversizing – selecting a valve Cv based on the largest conceivable flow condition rather than actual operating range, which results in the valve spending most of its life operating near the closed position with poor control resolution. This is avoided by sizing for the minimum, normal and maximum flow and differential pressure conditions, not just the maximum.
Sizing programs like Jordan, LowFlow, and Steriflow Valve’s JVCV/SVC Max allow you to enter all of those conditions in a table so that you can select a Cv that satisfies all the conditions, or at minimum warn the user what the operating conditions must be for the valve to operate optimally.
A second common error is ignoring cavitation and flashing potential, particularly in liquid applications with significant pressure drop. Sizing software such as the JVCV/SVCV Max is designed to predict cavitation, flashing, aerodynamic noise, and excessive outlet velocity before the valve is specified, rather than discovering the problem after installation.
A third mistake is selecting the wrong flow characteristic for the application. For example, selecting a Linear characteristic trim where pressure drop occurs mostly across the system, instead of the valve. Or, selecting an Equal Percentage characteristic when most of the pressure drop occurs across the valve, instead of across the system. Both can lead to poor controllability across the operating range.
Finally, overlooking actuator sizing and response time relative to the process dynamics can undermine even a correctly sized valve body. Using ISA/IEC-based sizing software rather than rule-of-thumb estimates addresses most of these issues at the selection stage.